United States v. Toya Olds

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 2009
Docket08-3746
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Toya Olds (United States v. Toya Olds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Toya Olds, (7th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued April 22, 2009 Decided October 20, 2009

Before

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 08‐3746 Appeal from the United States District UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Court for the Eastern District of Plaintiff‐Appellee, Wisconsin.

v. No. 06 CR 207

TOYA OLDS, Rudolph T. Randa, Defendant‐Appellant. Judge.

O R D E R

Toya Olds was part of a ring that starting in the mid‐1990s sold millions of dollars worth of cocaine in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. She pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and was sentenced, as a career offender, to 188 months’ imprisonment. Olds did not contest her career‐offender designation at sentencing or in her appellate brief, but at oral argument we raised the possibility that the application of the guideline was erroneous because it was based, in part, on a conviction for “second‐degree recklessly endangering safety.” See WIS. STAT. § 941.30(2). As we recently held, this offense is not a crime of violence. United States v. Bishop, No. 08‐1950, 2009 WL 2503646, at *1 (7th Cir. Aug. 17, 2009); see also United States v. Woods, No. 07‐3851, 2009 WL 2382700 (7th Cir. Aug. 5, 2009); United States v. Smith, 544 F.3d 781, 786 (7th Cir. 2008). And although we ordinarily we do not evaluate issues not presented by the parties themselves, the error here No. 08‐3746 Page 2

is plain, United States v. High, No. 08‐1970, 2009 WL 2382747, at *2 (7th Cir. Aug. 5, 2009), and we are always free to correct a plain error on our own authority, FED. R. CRIM. P. 52(b); United States v. Atkinson, 297 U.S. 157, 160 (1934); United States v. Neal, 512 F.3d 427, 439 n.11 (7th Cir. 2008); United States v. Muriel, 418 F.3d 720, 723 n.1 (7th Cir. 2005).

Olds’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Atkinson
297 U.S. 157 (Supreme Court, 1936)
United States v. Oscar O. Muriel
418 F.3d 720 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. High
576 F.3d 429 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Woods
576 F.3d 400 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Smith
544 F.3d 781 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Neal
512 F.3d 427 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Toya Olds, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-toya-olds-ca7-2009.