United States v. Torres-Rangel
This text of 20 F. App'x 609 (United States v. Torres-Rangel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Jose Antonio Torres-Rangel appeals the thirty-seven month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of being found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Torres-Rangel contends the district court erred by enhancing his sentence on the basis of his prior aggravated felony conviction, which was not pleaded in the indictment. Torres-Rangel’s contention is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 414-15 (9th Cir. 2000), ceri. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001) (stating Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) did not overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226-27, 118 S.Ct. 1219,140 L.Edüd 350 (1998)).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 F. App'x 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-torres-rangel-ca9-2001.