United States v. Torres

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 F.3d 909
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2001·No. 00-20656·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20656 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DIONICO CHAVEZ TORRES, also known as Dionicio Chavez Torres,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-1430 & H-98-CR-287-1 -------------------- February 13, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dionico Chavez Torres, federal prisoner No. 83001-079,

requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the

district court’s ruling in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Torres moves this court to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) and he

requests an evidentiary hearing.

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). An examination of the record in this case discloses

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-20656 -2-

this court lacks appellate jurisdiction because no final judgment

has been entered in this case. See Dardar v. Lafourche Realty

Co., 849 F.2d 955, 957 (5th Cir. 1988); Save the Bay, Inc. v.

United States Army, 639 F.2d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir. 1981).

Accordingly, the motions for COA, IFP, and an evidentiary

hearing are DENIED AS MOOT and the appeal is DISMISSED.

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Torres, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Torres (United States v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related