United States v. Torres
This text of United States v. Torres (United States v. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-11335 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODOLFO TORRES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:92-CR-008-R ---------------------
January 7, 2000
Before POLITZ, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Rodolfo Torres has filed a
motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Torres was sent a copy of counsel’s motion
and brief, but he has filed no response. Our review of the brief
filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous
point for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Torres, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-torres-ca5-2000.