United States v. Torres-Avila
This text of 115 F. App'x 722 (United States v. Torres-Avila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 17, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 04-40527 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARMANDO TORRES-AVILA, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:02-CR-819-1 --------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Armando Torres-Avila (Torres) appeals his guilty-plea
conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation.
He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and that his
sentence is improper under Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531
(2004). These arguments are, as he concedes, foreclosed. See
Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998); United
States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-40527 -2-
for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263); United States
v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Torres’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 F. App'x 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-torres-avila-ca5-2004.