United States v. Toro

D. Connecticut

United States v. Toro

335 F. Supp. 2d 267, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12762, 2004 WL 1553602

CourtDistrict Court, D. Connecticut

DecidedJuly 6, 2004

Docket3:02CR362PCD

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 335 F. Supp. 2d 267 (United States v. Toro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Toro, 335 F. Supp. 2d 267, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12762, 2004 WL 1553602 (D. Conn. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER CORRECTING SENTENCE

DORSEY, District Judge.

Pursuant to the mandate from the Second Circuit [Doc. No. 43], Defendant was resentenced on June 29, 2004. Defendant has filed a Fed. R.Ceim. P. 35(a) motion to correct sentence. In light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision *268 Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), the sentence rendered on June 29, 2004 is hereby ORDERED corrected as follows: Defendant shall serve a term of six months, with all other terms of the June 29 sentence to stand.

A more detailed memorandum shall follow.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI