United States v. Toppin

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Toppin

523 F. App'x 230

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2013·No. No. 13-6237·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Durrell Toppin appeals the district court’s order construing his motion as seeking relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying the motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Toppin, No. 1:07-cr-00013-JCC-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense [231] with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Durrell Toppin appeals the district court’s order construing his motion as seeking relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying the motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Toppin, No. 1:07-cr-00013-JCC-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense [231] with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Toppin, 523 F. App'x 230 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

523 F. App'x 230 (United States v. Toppin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related