United States v. Tony Alexander

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 27, 2012
Docket12-7219
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Tony Alexander (United States v. Tony Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tony Alexander, (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7219

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONY BERNARD ALEXANDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Kelli Hamby Ferry, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tony B. Alexander appeals from the district court’s

order granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). * We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-00178-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. June 8, 2012); see

United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir. 2009)

(holding that § 3582(c) proceeding is not a resentencing). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court granted Alexander’s § 3582 motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Alexander’s sentence to the full extent he requested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Tony Alexander, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tony-alexander-ca4-2012.