United States v. Tobar-Campos

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2008·No. 08-50037·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS I L E D F FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 6, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 08-50037 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HUGO ROLANDO TOBAR-CAMPOS, also known as Alfredo Valesco-Messina

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-991-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hugo Rolando Tobar-Campos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda- Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-50037

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tobar-Campos, (5th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Tobar-Campos (United States v. Tobar-Campos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Pineda-Arrellano
492 F.3d 624 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)