United States v. Timmons

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Timmons

616 F. App'x 124

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2015·No. No. 15-6668·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Andy Timmons appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Timmons, No. 4:08-cr-00373-RBH-l (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2015). We deny the motions to modify the transcript order and for summary remand. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Andy Timmons appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Timmons, No. 4:08-cr-00373-RBH-l (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2015). We deny the motions to modify the transcript order and for summary remand. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Timmons, 616 F. App'x 124 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

616 F. App'x 124 (United States v. Timmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related