United States v. Thurman

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 23, 2009
• Docket: 08-8380
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8380

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT ANDREW THURMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00020-LHT-1; 4:98-cr-00089-LHT-1)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Andrew Thurman, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Andrew Thurman appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence

filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Thurman, Nos. 4:96-cr-00020-LHT-1; 4:98-cr-00089-LHT-1

(W.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED