United States v. Thornburgh

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 2011
Docket09-5156
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Thornburgh (United States v. Thornburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Thornburgh, (10th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK Byron White United States Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80257 (303) 844-3157 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Douglas E. Cressler Clerk of Court May 27, 2011 Chief Deputy Clerk

Mr. Fred Randolph Lynn Lewis Law Office LLC 810 S. Cincinnati Avenue Suite 110 Tulsa, OK 74119

RE: 09-5156, United States v. Thornburgh Dist/Ag docket: 4:07-CR-00195-CVE-2

Dear Counsel:

Enclosed is a copy of the opinion of the court issued today in this matter. The court has entered judgment on the docket pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 36.

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 40, any petition for rehearing must be filed within 14 days after entry of judgment. Please note, however, that if the appeal is a civil case in which the United States or its officer or agency is a party, any petition for rehearing must be filed within 45 days after entry of judgment. Parties should consult both the Federal Rules and local rules of this court with regard to applicable standards and requirements. In particular, petitions for rehearing may not exceed 15 pages in length, and no answer is permitted unless the court enters an order requiring a response. If requesting rehearing en banc, the requesting party must file 18 paper copies with the clerk, in addition to satisfying all Electronic Case Filing requirements. See Fed. R. App. P. Rules 35 and 40, and 10th Cir. R. 35 and 40 for further information governing petitions for rehearing.

Please contact this office if you have questions. Sincerely,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of the Court

cc: Catherine J. Depew Kevin Chambers Leitch Charles M. McLoughlin

EAS/jm

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Irvin
656 F.3d 1151 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Talk
446 F. App'x 114 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Hoodenpyle
461 F. App'x 675 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Grose
461 F. App'x 786 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Mendoza-Lopez
669 F.3d 1148 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
Fisher Sand & Gravel, Co. v. Girón
465 F. App'x 774 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Ruiz-Bautista
466 F. App'x 741 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Irvin
682 F.3d 1254 (Tenth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Irvin
Tenth Circuit, 2012

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Thornburgh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thornburgh-ca10-2011.