United States v. Thompson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 F. App'x 227
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2003·No. 02-10996·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D April 24, 2003 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-10996 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK DESHAN THOMPSON, also known as Play Pretty,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:02-CR-38-1-C - - - - - - - - - -

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Patrick

Deshan Thompson has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Thompson has filed a response asserting insufficient

evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel and requesting

appointment of new appellate counsel.

Our independent review of the brief, Thompson’s response,

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-10996 -2-

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Because the appeal is dismissed, Thompson’s motion for

appointment of counsel is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thompson, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Thompson (United States v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)