United States v. Thompson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 F. App'x 227
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 20, 2003·No. 02-30597·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30597 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACKIE THOMPSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CR-325-ALL -------------------- February 20, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jackie

Thompson has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thompson has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw

is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thompson, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Thompson (United States v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)