United States v. Thompson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Thompson

670 F. App'x 75

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2016·No. No. 16-6876·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thompson, No. 4:08-cr-00057-D-1 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar[76] gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thompson, No. 4:08-cr-00057-D-1 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar[76] gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Thompson, 670 F. App'x 75 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 75 (United States v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related