United States v. Thompson
This text of 670 F. App'x 75 (United States v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Michael Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thompson, No. 4:08-cr-00057-D-1 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar[76]*76gument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thompson-ca4-2016.