United States v. Thompson
This text of United States v. Thompson (United States v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7633
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LAWRENCE ODELL THOMPSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:07-cr-00470-HEH-3)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 21, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Odell Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Odell Thompson appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion
for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Thompson, No. 3:07-cr-00470-HEH-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Thompson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thompson-ca4-2011.