United States v. Thomas

172 F. App'x 601
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 348 F.3d 78
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2006·No. 05-30540·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Henry Alfred Thomas appeals the post-Booker ** sentence imposed by the district court upon his conviction for distribution of crack cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841. He argues that the district court’s imposition of the maximum guideline sentence of 210 months was unreasonable in light of the Government’s motion for downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 based on his substantial assistance.

Thomas has failed to rebut the presumption of reasonableness afforded his properly calculated guideline sentence. United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir .2006).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

**

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thomas, 172 F. App'x 601 (5th Cir. 2006).

172 F. App'x 601 (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Alonzo
435 F.3d 551 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)