United States v. Thomas
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 23, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 02-20764 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
STERLING THOMAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-540-1 --------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Sterling Thomas has filed a
motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thomas has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the record and
counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Thomas (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.