United States v. Thomas
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40241
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LAWRENCE QUINTON THOMAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (01-CR-33)
August 7, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The federal public defender appointed to represent Lawrence
Quinton Thomas has moved to withdraw as Thomas’s counsel and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California.1 Thomas has not
filed a response to the motion.
Thomas knowingly and voluntarily waived his appeal rights,
except as to sentencing guideline determinations, and our
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1 386 U.S. 738 (1967). independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Thomas (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.