United States v. Thomas

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 203 F.3d 350
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 8, 2002·No. 02-40241·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40241

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LAWRENCE QUINTON THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (01-CR-33)

August 7, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The federal public defender appointed to represent Lawrence

Quinton Thomas has moved to withdraw as Thomas’s counsel and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California.1 Thomas has not

filed a response to the motion.

Thomas knowingly and voluntarily waived his appeal rights,

except as to sentencing guideline determinations, and our

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1 386 U.S. 738 (1967). independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thomas, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Thomas (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)