United States v. Thomas

Opinion

ON REHEARING

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6553

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DION THOMAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-00-176-F; CA-04-864-F)

Submitted: February 24, 2006 Decided: March 14, 2006

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dion Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas B. Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Dion Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Thomas, No. CA-04-864-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -