United States v. Thomas

67 F. App'x 224

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to show cause as to why it failed to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Thomas, No. CR-97-299-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.