United States v. Thomas

37 F. App'x 664
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 F. App'x 277
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2002·No. 02-6526·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Anthony Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for production of a certified copy of the jury instructions in relation to his previously adjudicated motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). Thomas’ § 2255 motion has been finally decided, and he is accordingly not entitled to a *665 transcript of the jury instructions at this juncture. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). Thus, we conclude the district court’s denial of Thomas’ motion is proper. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thomas, 37 F. App'x 664 (4th Cir. 2002).

37 F. App'x 664 (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related