United States v. Thomas

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Thomas

362 F. App'x 54

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 2010

DocketNo. 09-11118

StatusPublished

This text of 362 F. App'x 54 (United States v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Thomas, 362 F. App'x 54 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lynn Palmer Bailey, appointed counsel for Dontrell A. Thomas, has filed a motion [55]*55to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lynn Palmer Bailey, appointed counsel for Dontrell A. Thomas, has filed a motion [55]*55to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 F. App'x 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-ca11-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack