United States v. Thomas

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Thomas

362 F. App'x 54

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 20, 2010·No. No. 09-11118·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lynn Palmer Bailey, appointed counsel for Dontrell A. Thomas, has filed a motion [55] to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lynn Palmer Bailey, appointed counsel for Dontrell A. Thomas, has filed a motion [55] to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Thomas, 362 F. App'x 54 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

362 F. App'x 54 (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related