United States v. Thomas

74 M.J. 272, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 204
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedFebruary 27, 2015
DocketNo. 15-0288/AF
StatusPublished

This text of 74 M.J. 272 (United States v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Thomas, 74 M.J. 272, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 204 (Ark. 2015).

Opinions

CCA S32163. On consideration of Appellant’s motion for leave to file a petition out of time, Appellee’s motion to dismiss Appellant’s petition for lack of jurisdiction, and Appellee’s motion to attach, and in light of United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 969 (2009), it is ordered that Appellant’s motion for leave to file a petition out of time is hereby denied without prejudice to filing a writ of error coram nobis at the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (see Denedo v. United States, 66 M.J. 114 (C.A.A.F. 2008), aff'd, 556 U.S. 904 (2009)); Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review for lack of jurisdiction and motion to attach are hereby denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Denedo
556 U.S. 904 (Supreme Court, 2009)
United States v. Rodriguez
67 M.J. 110 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2009)
Denedo v. United States
66 M.J. 114 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 M.J. 272, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-armfor-2015.