United States v. Thomas
This text of 74 M.J. 272 (United States v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
CCA S32163. On consideration of Appellant’s motion for leave to file a petition out of time, Appellee’s motion to dismiss Appellant’s petition for lack of jurisdiction, and Appellee’s motion to attach, and in light of United States v. Rodriguez, 67 M.J. 110 (C.A.A.F. 2009), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 969 (2009), it is ordered that Appellant’s motion for leave to file a petition out of time is hereby denied without prejudice to filing a writ of error coram nobis at the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (see Denedo v. United States, 66 M.J. 114 (C.A.A.F. 2008), aff'd, 556 U.S. 904 (2009)); Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review for lack of jurisdiction and motion to attach are hereby denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 M.J. 272, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-armfor-2015.