United States v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Thomas

76 M.J. 72, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 64

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided January 26, 2017·No. No. 17-0125/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20150393. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and the record of trial, it -is noted that the military judge neglected to seal the transcript of an MRE 412 hearing at pages 49-70 of the record. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition is hereby granted and that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is .affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 20150393. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and the record of trial, it -is noted that the military judge neglected to seal the transcript of an MRE 412 hearing at pages 49-70 of the record. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition is hereby granted and that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is .affirmed.

Footnotes

United States v. Thomas, 76 M.J. 72, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 64 (Ark. 2017).

Pincite

76 M.J. 72 (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.