United States v. Thomas

76 M.J. 72, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 64
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 26, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0125/AR
StatusPublished

This text of 76 M.J. 72 (United States v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Thomas, 76 M.J. 72, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 64 (Ark. 2017).

Opinion

CCA 20150393. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals and the record of trial, it -is noted that the military judge neglected to seal the transcript of an MRE 412 hearing at pages 49-70 of the record. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition is hereby granted and that the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is .affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 72, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-armfor-2017.