United States v. Thibodeaux
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10964 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH CLEVELAND THIBODEAUX,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-24-2 --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Cleveland
Thibodeaux has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Thibodeaux filed a response and has moved for the appointment of
substitute counsel. Our independent review of counsel’s brief,
Thibodeaux’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-10964 -2-
5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The motion for the appointment of substitute
counsel is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Thibodeaux (United States v. Thibodeaux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.