United States v. Thibodeaux

115 F. App'x 708
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2004
Docket04-20231
StatusUnpublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 115 F. App'x 708 (United States v. Thibodeaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Thibodeaux, 115 F. App'x 708 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Shirley Thibodeaux appeals her sentence imposed on a guilty-plea conviction for fraud in connection with identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7), (b)(1)(D), (c)(3)(A). Thibodeaux argues that the district court erred in imposing a 12-level adjustment because the loss attributed to Thibodeaux exceeded $200,000, a two-level adjustment because the offense involved more than 10 but fewer than 50 victims, and a two-level adjustment because Thibodeaux used one means of identification to unlawfully obtain another means of identification. See U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(l)(G), (b)(2)(A), (b)(9)(C)(i)(Nov.2002).

For the first time on appeal, Thibodeaux argues that these sentencing adjustments were unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). As Thibodeaux concedes, her Blakely argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 473 (5th Cir.2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263). Accordingly, Thibodeaux’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Thibodeaux
144 F. App'x 438 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Thibodeaux v. United States
544 U.S. 1013 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Cruz v. United States
544 U.S. 1013 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 F. App'x 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thibodeaux-ca5-2004.