United States v. Theophile J. Taken Alive

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Theophile J. Taken Alive

507 F. App'x 609

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 22, 2013

Docket12-3578

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 507 F. App'x 609 (United States v. Theophile J. Taken Alive) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Theophile J. Taken Alive, 507 F. App'x 609 (8th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Theophile Taken Alive was convicted of a federal sex offense in February 2002. Then in 2012, Taken Alive was charged with failing to update his registration as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). 42 U.S.C. § 16901 et seq. He moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of a claim which we have already rejected. Taken Alive argues that the Attorney General cannot constitutionally be given authority to determine SORNA’s applicability to sex offenders who were convicted before the statute’s enactment, 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d), citing the nondelegation doctrine of the United States-Constitution. See Panama Ref. Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388, 421, 55 S.Ct. 241, 79 L.Ed. 446 (1935). The district court 1 upheld the constitutionality of the act. Taken Alive then conditionally plead guilty, reserving the right to appeal the nondelegation issue.

A legislative enactment does not violate the nondelegation clause so- long as the law contains an “intelligible principle” to guide the implementing authority.. Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 372, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989). We recently considered nondelegation challenges to SORNA in United States v. Kuehl, 706 F.3d 917 (8th Cir.2013), and United States v. Fernandez, 710 F.3d 847 (8th Cir.2013). We concluded there that SORNA contains an “intelligible principle” guiding the Attorney General’s exercise of delegated authority. Kuehl, 706 F.3d at 920; Fernandez, 710 F.3d at 849. As Taken Alive’s challenge is identical to the question raised and decided in Kuehl and Fernandez, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for'the District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendation of-the Honorable John E. Simko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Theophile Taken Alive was convicted of a federal sex offense in February 2002. Then in 2012, Taken Alive was charged with failing to update his registration as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). 42 U.S.C. § 16901 et seq. He moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of a claim which we have already rejected. Taken Alive argues that the Attorney General cannot constitutionally be given authority to determine SORNA’s applicability to sex offenders who were convicted before the statute’s enactment, 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d), citing the nondelegation doctrine of the United States-Constitution. See Panama Ref. Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388, 421, 55 S.Ct. 241, 79 L.Ed. 446 (1935). The district court 1 upheld the constitutionality of the act. Taken Alive then conditionally plead guilty, reserving the right to appeal the nondelegation issue.

A legislative enactment does not violate the nondelegation clause so- long as the law contains an “intelligible principle” to guide the implementing authority.. Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 372, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989). We recently considered nondelegation challenges to SORNA in United States v. Kuehl, 706 F.3d 917 (8th Cir.2013), and United States v. Fernandez, 710 F.3d 847 (8th Cir.2013). We concluded there that SORNA contains an “intelligible principle” guiding the Attorney General’s exercise of delegated authority. Kuehl, 706 F.3d at 920; Fernandez, 710 F.3d at 849. As Taken Alive’s challenge is identical to the question raised and decided in Kuehl and Fernandez, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for'the District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendation of-the Honorable John E. Simko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 F. App'x 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-theophile-j-taken-alive-ca8-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack