United States v. Terrence Dickens
This text of United States v. Terrence Dickens (United States v. Terrence Dickens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7005
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TERRENCE LOVELL DICKENS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00026-D-1)
Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: December 27, 2018
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrence Lovell Dickens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Terrence Lovell Dickens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18
U.S.C § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to
the United States Sentencing Guidelines. “We review a district court’s decision to grant
or deny a sentence-reduction motion under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion.” United
States v. Peters, 843 F.3d 572, 577 (4th Cir. 2016). Because our review of the record
reveals no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Terrence Dickens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-terrence-dickens-ca4-2018.