United States v. Terrell

266 F. App'x 225
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 2008
Docket07-7223
StatusUnpublished

This text of 266 F. App'x 225 (United States v. Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Terrell, 266 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brooks James Terrell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered judgment on June 19, 2007; the ten-day appeal period expired on July 3, 2007. Terrell filed a notice of appeal on August 2, 2007 — after the ten-day period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Terrell has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jose v. Reyes
759 F.2d 351 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 F. App'x 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-terrell-ca4-2008.