United States v. Terrance Smalls

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2018·No. 18-6715·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6715

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRANCE L. SMALLS, a/k/a T, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:98-cr-00322-RMG-27)

Submitted: October 23, 2018 Decided: October 26, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance L. Smalls, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrance L. Smalls appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and denying Smalls’ postjudgment motions to alter or amend judgement. * We review a district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion and its ruling regarding the scope of its legal authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo. United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013). Based on our review of the record and relevant legal authorities, we conclude that the district court did not reversibly err in determining that Smalls is ineligible for a sentence reduction under Guidelines Amendments 706, 750, and 782. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smalls, No. 9:98-cr-00322-RMG-27 (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2018 & May 14, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Although a district court lacks authority to reconsider its ruling on a § 3582(c)(2)

motion, United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), “this prohibition [is] non-jurisdictional, and thus waived when the government fail[s] to assert it below,” United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 252 (2017).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Terrance Smalls, (4th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Terrance Smalls (United States v. Terrance Smalls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Robert Mann
709 F.3d 301 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. David May
855 F.3d 271 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)