United States v. Templeton
This text of United States v. Templeton (United States v. Templeton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7633
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND BERNARD TEMPLETON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:97-cr-00007-FDW-4)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Segal, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Raymond Bernard Templeton appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Templeton’s
motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. United States v. Templeton, No. 3:97-cr-
00007-FDW-4 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Templeton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-templeton-ca4-2009.