United States v. Ted Duckett
This text of United States v. Ted Duckett (United States v. Ted Duckett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7190 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7190
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TED DUCKETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:13-cr-00626-TDC-1)
Submitted: April 11, 2024 Decided: April 16, 2024
Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ted Duckett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7190 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ted Duckett appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release and denying his motion for
reconsideration, which the district construed as a new compassionate release motion. We
review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion.
United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record
and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Duckett’s
motions for compassionate release. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th
Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release
motion). Accordingly, we grant Duckett’s motion to amend his informal brief and affirm
the district court’s orders. United States v. Duckett, No. 8:13-cr-00626-TDC-1 (D. Md.
filed Oct. 17, 2023 & entered Oct. 18, 2023; filed Jan. 23, 2024 & entered Jan. 24, 2024).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ted Duckett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ted-duckett-ca4-2024.