United States v. Taylor

5 F. App'x 708
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 F. App'x 14
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2001·No. No. 00-35662; D.C. No. CV-99-00260-REJ·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Willie Lee Taylor appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Taylor pleaded guilty in 1998 to distributing cocaine base. In his section 2255 motion, Taylor contends that the district court erred in sentencing him when it failed to depart downward based on his diminished capacity.

Because the district court recognized it had the authority to depart and elected not to, we have no jurisdiction to consider this issue. See United States v. Ladum, 141 F.3d 1328, 1344 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 898, 119 S.Ct. 225, 142 L.Ed.2d 185 (1998).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Taylor, 5 F. App'x 708 (9th Cir. 2001).

5 F. App'x 708 (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related