United States v. Taylor

5 F. App'x 708
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 2001
DocketNo. 00-35662; D.C. No. CV-99-00260-REJ
StatusPublished

This text of 5 F. App'x 708 (United States v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Taylor, 5 F. App'x 708 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Willie Lee Taylor appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Taylor pleaded guilty in 1998 to distributing cocaine base. In his section 2255 motion, Taylor contends that the district court erred in sentencing him when it failed to depart downward based on his diminished capacity.

Because the district court recognized it had the authority to depart and elected not to, we have no jurisdiction to consider this issue. See United States v. Ladum, 141 F.3d 1328, 1344 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 898, 119 S.Ct. 225, 142 L.Ed.2d 185 (1998).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 F. App'x 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-taylor-ca9-2001.