United States v. Taylor

46 F. App'x 161
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 F. App'x 62
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 9, 2002·No. 02-6354·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles P. Taylor appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion to dismiss the indictment and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Taylor, No. CR-99-99 (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2001; Jan. 22, 2002); see United States v. Emmanuel, 288 F.3d 644, 649 (4th Cir.2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *162 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Taylor, 46 F. App'x 161 (4th Cir. 2002).

46 F. App'x 161 (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Shahborn Emmanuel
288 F.3d 644 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)