United States v. Tafoya-Gonzales

10 F. App'x 593
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 2001
DocketNo. 00-50374; D.C. No. CR-00-20-AHS
StatusPublished

This text of 10 F. App'x 593 (United States v. Tafoya-Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tafoya-Gonzales, 10 F. App'x 593 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Antonio Tafoya-Gonzales appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being an alien found in the United States, following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Tafoya-Gonzales contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by 16 points because the fact that his prior deportation followed an aggravated felony conviction was neither admitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. He further contends that Apprendi calls into question the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). These arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), as amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order). United States v. Castillo Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1024-1025 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Castillo-Rivera
244 F.3d 1020 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 F. App'x 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tafoya-gonzales-ca9-2001.