United States v. Swinton

623 F. App'x 89

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 24, 2015
• Docket: No. 15-7274
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clifton Jermaine Swinton appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Swinton, No. 4:09-cr-01145-TLW-1 (D.S.C. July 29, 2015). We deny Swinton’s motions for a transcript at government expense and to appoint counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.