United States v. Swift
This text of United States v. Swift (United States v. Swift) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6777
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID SWIFT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (2:89-cr-00235-JAB-1)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Swift, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Swift appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Swift, No. 2:89-cr-00235-JAB-1
(M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Swift, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-swift-ca4-2009.