United States v. Swift

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2009
Docket09-6777
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Swift (United States v. Swift) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Swift, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6777

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID SWIFT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (2:89-cr-00235-JAB-1)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Swift, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Swift appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Swift, No. 2:89-cr-00235-JAB-1

(M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Swift, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-swift-ca4-2009.