United States v. Sutton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2002·No. 19-4324·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6161

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

QUINTON LEON SUTTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-355, CA-01-369-1)

Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Linwood Morgan, Jr., Charlotte, North Carolina; Marcia Gail Shein, LAW OFFICE OF MARCIA G. SHEIN, P.C., Decatur, Georgia, for Appellant. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Quinton Leon Sutton seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sutton’s motion for a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sutton, Nos. CR-

98-355; CA-01-369-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sutton, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Sutton (United States v. Sutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related