United States v. Sutton

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 16, 2004
• Docket: 03-7406
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7406

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner - Appellee,

versus

QUINTON LEON SUTTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-355)

Submitted: December 18, 2003 Decided: January 16, 2004

Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quinton Leon Sutton, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Quinton Leon Sutton appeals the district court’s order

affirming the magistrate judge’s order denying Sutton’s motion for

reconsideration of the denial of his motion to compel discovery.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United

States v. Sutton, No. CR-98-355 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -