United States v. Susan Rosenberg

D.C. Circuit

United States v. Susan Rosenberg

894 F.2d 1395, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 355, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1533

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 1990

Docket89-3070, 89-3071 and 89-3072

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 894 F.2d 1395 (United States v. Susan Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Susan Rosenberg, 894 F.2d 1395, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 355, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1533 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

Appellant’s Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

CONSTANCE L. DUPRE, CLERK

A statement of Circuit Judge WILLIAMS concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.

Circuit Judges EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and SENTELLE would grant the suggestion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI