United States v. Susan Rosenberg

894 F.2d 1395, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 355, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1533
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 2, 1990·No. 89-3070, 89-3071 and 89-3072·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Appellant’s Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

CONSTANCE L. DUPRE, CLERK

A statement of Circuit Judge WILLIAMS concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.

Circuit Judges EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and SENTELLE would grant the suggestion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Susan Rosenberg, 894 F.2d 1395, 282 U.S. App. D.C. 355, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1533 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

894 F.2d 1395 (United States v. Susan Rosenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Susan Rosenberg
894 F.2d 1395 (D.C. Circuit, 1990)