United States v. Surratt

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2006·No. 05-7051·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERRY HOWARD SURRATT, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-03-108)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Howard Surratt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Felice McConnell Corpening, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jerry Howard Surratt, Jr. appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s prior order

denying Surratt’s application for a writ of corum nobis pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Surratt v. United States, 5:03-CR-108-1-BO (E.D.N.C. May 18, 2005).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Surratt, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Surratt (United States v. Surratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.