United States v. Surratt

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Surratt

172 F. App'x 553

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2006·No. No. 05-7051·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Howard Surratt, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s prior order denying Surratt’s application for a writ of corum nobis pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Surratt v. United States, 5:03-CR-108-1-BO (E.D.N.C. May 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Howard Surratt, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s prior order denying Surratt’s application for a writ of corum nobis pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Surratt v. United States, 5:03-CR-108-1-BO (E.D.N.C. May 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Surratt, 172 F. App'x 553 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

172 F. App'x 553 (United States v. Surratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.