United States v. Surratt
This text of United States v. Surratt (United States v. Surratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JERRY HOWARD SURRATT, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-03-108)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Howard Surratt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Felice McConnell Corpening, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jerry Howard Surratt, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s prior order
denying Surratt’s application for a writ of corum nobis pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Surratt v. United States, 5:03-CR-108-1-BO (E.D.N.C. May 18, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Surratt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-surratt-ca4-2006.