United States v. Sullivan
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8194
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CARLTON CHRISTOPHER SULLIVAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:03-cr-00194-DKC-4)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlton Christopher Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Chan Park, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Carlton Christopher Sullivan appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Sullivan, No. 8:03-cr-00194-DKC-4 (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2008; Aug.
6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Sullivan (United States v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.