United States v. Sullivan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Sullivan. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 F. App'x 955
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2009·No. 08-8194·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8194

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CARLTON CHRISTOPHER SULLIVAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:03-cr-00194-DKC-4)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton Christopher Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Chan Park, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carlton Christopher Sullivan appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Sullivan, No. 8:03-cr-00194-DKC-4 (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2008; Aug.

6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sullivan, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Sullivan (United States v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related