United States v. Sullivan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Sullivan. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 F. App'x 604
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2003·No. 03-6347·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAVARALD ANTONIO SULLIVAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-97-797, CA-01-2226)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Javarald Antonio Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Miller Williams Shealy, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Javarald Antonio Sullivan seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Sullivan has not made a substantial showing of the denial of

a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029

(2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sullivan, (4th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Sullivan (United States v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)