United States v. Sullenberger

211 U.S. 522, 29 S. Ct. 186, 53 L. Ed. 311, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1781
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 4, 1909·No. 290·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice White

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the United States seeks the reversal of the action of the court below in quashing an indictment, the writ of error being prosecuted directly from this court upon the assumption that 'the case comes within the act of March 2, 1907. The indictment charged a conspiracy in violation of § 5440, Rev. Stat., to unlawfully acquire land of the United States under .the timber and stone act. The court gave to the indictment the same construction which it affixed to the indictment in the- case of United States v. Biggs et al., No. 289, which we have just decided, ante, p. 507, and applied the same principles which it expounded in the opinion in that case. Disregarding mere immaterial differences in the form of the pleadings *525 this case is like the Biggs case, and is disposed of by the opinion which we have just announced in that case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sullenberger, 211 U.S. 522, 29 S. Ct. 186, 53 L. Ed. 311, 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1781 (1909).

211 U.S. 522 (United States v. Sullenberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salt Lake City v. O'Connor
249 P. 810 (Utah Supreme Court, 1926)