United States v. Studnicka

236 F. App'x 129
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 21, 2007·No. 06-41542·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sean Alen Studnicka has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Studnicka has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Studnicka, 236 F. App'x 129 (5th Cir. 2007).

236 F. App'x 129 (United States v. Studnicka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rocha
598 F.3d 1144 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)