United States v. Stowe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7492

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

REGINALD JEROME STOWE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:96-cr-00046-FDW-1)

Submitted: September 28, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Jerome Stowe, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald Jerome Stowe appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his post-judgment motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Stowe, No. 3:96-cr-00046-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. July 21 & 31,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED