United States v. Stewart

589 F. App'x 92
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Stewart. Read the opinion of the Court — 540 F. App'x 171
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 23, 2014·No. No. 14-7251·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Albert Stewart, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stewart, No. 5:97-er00053-FPS-l, 2014 WL 4074689 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 14, 2014; Sept. 2, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Stewart, 589 F. App'x 92 (4th Cir. 2014).

589 F. App'x 92 (United States v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related